… separate agreements with the complainant regarding various dwellings located in Building G in accordance with Section 4 of the Maharashtra condominiums (promotion, construction regulation,… between the applicant and some of the respondents. In addition, on the “D” and “H” recitals of the agreement, which is carried out in accordance with MoFA Section 4, and clauses 6, 11…Provisions of the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act of 1970, all their rights, interests and titles, if they exist, in accordance with the agreement reached pursuant to Section 4 of the MOFA, novated/supe… Article 9: These persons pass on the land under construction and land which, in accordance with the building rules, to the greater Bombay Municipal Corporation`s development control rules, must be kept open to buyers of rental properties as soon as they constitute the cooperative housing company. And considering that an agreement made on the date of the – between Shri ________ernannte the promoter as agent, the part or package of the country of ownership and its in – in the registration sub-district of _________mts. or beyond, which are described in the first calendar as well as in the first calendar (hereafter referred to as the land in question) and on which the buildings/indoor buildings are built in accordance with the internal conditions of the development contract / the power of attorney: 19. We believe that the above condition of effective and complete disclosure arises from the obligation made to the project proponent in accordance with MOFA`s Ss.3 and 4 and V, which imposes the form of the agreement to the aforementioned extent. This obligation remains unbroken because the concept of development capacity must be read harmoniously with the concept of registering the company and placing securities.
Once the entire project is placed in front of the customers at the time of the agreement, g) 12.8.1997, the co-operative/The applicant and five members (members) led appeal 4385/97 against the promoter of the promotion project, a referral order, preventing the developer from establishing other constructions and challenging the validity of the sanction granted by the competent authority to the amended plan of 29-3-2001, by which the competent authority sanctioned 5-2 wings using the new available ISP. 54. To the extent that the confidence of the lawyer trained and based on the judgment of that court is applicable to the facts of the case in Grand Paradi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Mont Blanc Properties – Pvt Industries. Ltd. . In point 7 of the judgment, the learned judges of the division decided that the agreement in question between the parties was executed in 1971 and 1971, that the format in which the agreement was to be registered was not mandatory and that this obligation was first imposed in 1986. It is in this opinion that qualified judges stated in Rule 8 of the sentence, as follows: 50.
In this regard, the proponent`s advisor relied on clauses 38 and 51 of the agreement. It is argued that the proponent of the project was not required to carry out the section 38 transportation unless the full payment was made. Paragraphs 38 and 51 of the agreement are as follows: …, he argued that public spaces and facilities do not contain car parks and that these car parks are not regulated by mopeds.